Comments on: Aspect programming http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/84.html Titanium Exposé Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:54:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: Ian Bicking http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/84.html/comment-page-1#comment-581 Ian Bicking Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-581 I have at various times tried to figure out what Aspect programming is.  I found this post very helpful:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=8ef9bea6.0311052119.4f5ab5d6%40posting.google.com

After reading it I felt I understood what aspect oriented programming was, though I also was unimpressed with it as a programming technique.  But at least I know why now ;)  The fact that it typically works on the program text is especially bad in my mind.  That’s a sign that either the language is not powerful enough, or the programmers don’t know how to use the language well enough.

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/84.html/comment-page-1#comment-582 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-582 Aspect define several behaviours, and the link you’ve post only seems to talk about ‘using AOP to build a Constraint API’.

Having part of the buzz logic of an object outside it, is really a bad habit. And this really show that : it should be object oriented langage, and the programmers need to do the right job.

But i think AOP can be a good approach to plug compoments, without having a verbose API between them. But perhaps i only need to look at the observer design pattern.

]]>