<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Howto to spam-protect your python-based blog with bayesian filter.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html</link>
	<description>Titanium Exposé</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liliane</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Liliane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Spam Filtering may reduce the number of spam for a short while but you cant say that it is an ultimate solution to Spamming. The reason is that the Spammers are aware of these filtering techniques whether it is Filtering with BogoFire or some other. There are many websites available that are providing the information on Anti-Spamming Solutions but most of this information is either irrelevant or not useful. I have recently visited a website that I would like to suggest&#160; 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.anti-spam-info.com" title="Spam Filtering" rel="nofollow"&gt;Anti-Spam Solutions&lt;/a&gt; Website
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam Filtering may reduce the number of spam for a short while but you cant say that it is an ultimate solution to Spamming. The reason is that the Spammers are aware of these filtering techniques whether it is Filtering with BogoFire or some other. There are many websites available that are providing the information on Anti-Spamming Solutions but most of this information is either irrelevant or not useful. I have recently visited a website that I would like to suggest&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.anti-spam-info.com" title="Spam Filtering" rel="nofollow">Anti-Spam Solutions</a> Website<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Reverend Jkx :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Reverend Jkx :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-436</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So, now your comments RSS feed is usable, right? Because it still seem to contain some spam in there (article 239)..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, now your comments RSS feed is usable, right? Because it still seem to contain some spam in there (article 239)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jkx</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jkx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, my comment RSS is still full of SPAM. I need to apply the filter here to. Right now, I'm using this to check everything is Ok. I will switch soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bye ..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, my comment RSS is still full of SPAM. I need to apply the filter here to. Right now, I&#8217;m using this to check everything is Ok. I will switch soon.</p>
<p>Bye ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-438</guid>
		<description>What happens to the spam database file when two people submit a comment at the same time?&#160; Is there a way to prevent it from getting corrupted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens to the spam database file when two people submit a comment at the same time?&nbsp; Is there a way to prevent it from getting corrupted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jkx</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jkx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This depends on the way you plug this in your webapp, but you can easily protect the write with a lock.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This depends on the way you plug this in your webapp, but you can easily protect the write with a lock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/244.html#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How is the filter working out these days? Is this approach still worth implementing? Thanks, Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the filter working out these days? Is this approach still worth implementing? Thanks, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.053 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
