Comments on: Ouch: Plone 2.0 vs Plone 2.1 http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html Titanium Exposé Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:54:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: Mike Watkins http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1010 Mike Watkins Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1010 Compare that to a purpose built Quixote app:

target: a moderately complex internationalized document object in a CMS:

lighttpd / scgi:
HTML transferred:       4167500 bytes
Requests per second:    134.99 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       7.41 [ms] (mean)
Transfer rate:          1150.92 [Kbytes/sec] received


Medusa:
HTML transferred:       4167500 bytes
Requests per second:    127.16 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       7.86 [ms] (mean)
Transfer rate:          1079.22 [Kbytes/sec] received

Target: Root page, only a few objects resolving and minor security check

lighttpd / scgi:
HTML transferred:       1802000 bytes
Requests per second:    309.21 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       3.23 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       3.23 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          1173.47 [Kbytes/sec] received


Medusa:
Requests per second:    268.24 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       3.73 [ms] (mean)

These tests run on a single CPU development workstation running X / xfce at the same time and a swack of other stuff; 1GB ram, 2.4ghz processor.

Of course, with Plone/Zope I could inherit a swack of software and perhaps write very little myself; so there’s real time and productivity saved there… at the same time, I’d have to invest a lot of energy in learning the platform before proficiency could be achieved. Plusses and minuses.

Quixote – or any of the simpler frameworks – certainly have a place.

]]> By: ogrisel http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1011 ogrisel Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1011 You might be interested in having a look at funkload to do automated benchmark of your favorite CMS.

http://public.dev.nuxeo.com/~ben/funkload/

Patches, bug reports, feature requests should go to :

http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/newticket

under the "funkload" component.

]]> By: Maik http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1012 Maik Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1012 One Question:

Why do you run Zope in Debug-Mode for Benchmarking? This may have a significant impact on your Performance.

And, yes with ZEO your System will run remarkably faster if you have more than 1 CPU…

Kind Regards
Maik

]]> By: Maik http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1013 Maik Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1013 Sorry for the debug statement, I read "with debug enabled" :-o

I Should get another cup of coffee quick ;-)

]]> By: freeformz http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1014 freeformz Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1014 What program did you use and what arguments did you pass to said program? Just curious…

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1015 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1015 Ab2 -n 10 (I don’t test concurrent request, it will be worst..)

]]> By: bcroq http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1016 bcroq Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1016 In fact, Plone doesn’t seem to suffer from concurrency:

-c1 -n100:
Requests per second:    2.77 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       360.872 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       360.872 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-c5 -n100:
Requests per second:    2.82 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       1771.659 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       354.332 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-c10 -n100:
Requests per second:    2.82 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       3540.563 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       354.056 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-c20 -n200:
Requests per second:    2.84 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       7053.295 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       352.665 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
-c50 -n500:
Requests per second:    2.78 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       18011.671 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       360.233 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
]]> By: Michael Watkins http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1017 Michael Watkins Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1017 Here’s the same, Quixote, medusa. It doesn’t suffer from a big load at it either. Lightweight has its dividends ;-)

Server Software: Medusa/1.11 Document Length: 6743 bytes

ab -c 1 -n 500 http://dev.mikewatkins.net:8080/testfolder/xyz/mydoc/
ab -c 2 -n 500 http://dev.mikewatkins.net:8080/testfolder/xyz/mydoc/
ab -c 4 -n 500 http://dev.mikewatkins.net:8080/testfolder/xyz/mydoc/

Concurrency Level:      1
Time taken for tests:   4.335 seconds
Requests per second:    115.34 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       8.67 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       8.67 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          795.27 [Kbytes/sec] received

Concurrency Level:      2
Time taken for tests:   4.273 seconds
Requests per second:    117.01 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       17.09 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       8.55 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          806.81 [Kbytes/sec] received

Concurrency Level:      4
Time taken for tests:   4.294 seconds
Requests per second:    116.44 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       34.35 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       8.59 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          804.47 [Kbytes/sec] received

And then to extremes. The system is very responsive to a real user while this runs:

Concurrency Level:      20
Time taken for tests:   20.550 seconds
Complete requests:      1500
Failed requests:        0
Broken pipe errors:     0
Total transferred:      10349395 bytes
HTML transferred:       10121243 bytes
Requests per second:    72.99 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       274.00 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       13.70 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          503.62 [Kbytes/sec] received
]]> By: Michael Watkins http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1018 Michael Watkins Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1018 And if your blog "preview" worked I might be able to format that! :D

Cheers…

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/217.html/comment-page-1#comment-1019 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-1019 The preview works .. except that firefox or moz block it ..

]]>