Comments on: Small is beautifull: CherryPy http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html Titanium Exposé Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:54:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: j.rebhan http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-486 j.rebhan Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-486 cherrypy and kid template and sarissa javascript library !!
highly recomended.

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-487 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-487 Hum, for templating .. i’m a Cheetah hacktivist, old-school ;)

– Bye

]]> By: Lawouach http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-488 Lawouach Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-488 Well the good thing is that CherryPy doesn’t force you to use a specific template language. So for instance, I use XSLT thanks to 4suite :)

XML powa! ;)

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-489 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-489 Even the SSL server it’s just a piece of cake: http://www.cherrypy.org/wiki/SslCherry

]]> By: projecktzero http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-490 projecktzero Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-490 I’ve recently been trying to decide on a web framework to try out. SkunkWEB, Quixote, Webware, Nevow… I keep coming back to CherryPy since it seems to make more sense to me. 

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-491 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-491 For me the quick challengers:

  • Quixote: because it support lot of deployement without thread issues.
  • Webware: because it is light speed and simple
  • SkunkWeb: no fork for me
  • CherryPy: because version 2.0 fix the 1.0 API

Which one to choose ? All :)

]]> By: A. Nonny. Moose. http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-492 A. Nonny. Moose. Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-492 You should also check out Subway — a python port of "Ruby On Rails".

]]> By: rsz http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-493 rsz Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-493 Come on, cherrypy in production environment? Grow up… Cherrypy+Cheetah=probably the most headaching unholy hackful team ever ;)

]]> By: Jkx http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-494 Jkx Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-494 I don’t care about production issue in this case. But i’ve heard a lot a good things about cherrypy in production. I think that most python framework has the same issue in fact.

For Cheetah, I feel really happy with. I know there is a lot of fancy_hype templating system. But I think most are too restrictive or to conceptual.

Bye Bye

]]> By: robo http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/202.html/comment-page-1#comment-495 robo Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-495 rsz: If you’re saying no way to CherryPy in production, then what is your proposed alternative? I’ve been putting Zope sites and apps into production for the past few years, and I’m looking for something lighter weight where the framework doesn’t get in my way. What about CherryPy doesn’t meet the grade? I’m also eval’ing Aquarium.

]]>